Does Tweeting in Court Jeopardize a Fair Trail?

Does Tweeting in Court Jeopardize a Fair Trail?

Baker Creative > Blog > Marketing > Does Tweeting in Court Jeopardize a Fair Trail?

Trial judges are now required to order jurors not to use phones or other electronic devices while in trial or in deliberations. Would it be right to tweet about the latest happenings if you were on the jury, the judge, or even worse the defending attorney? At what great lengths does society need to put the breaks on social media applications? Being bored in such a scenario isn’t enough of a reason to be negligent, which could lead to a mistrial.

Googling for background info on a case is the legal equivalent of clearly crossing the line. Jurors need to utilize the facts presented in a trial, not base their opinions upon outside influences. When a judge interviewed the other jurors, he discovered that in total, nine of the 12 had been Googling after hours. Some were even found to post updates on their Facebook pages. This habit of gathering more information has clearly crossed the line.

Reality TV, TMZ, TV court shows have given the public a free look inside courtrooms. The line has clearly blurred between irresponsible access and even understanding the implications of such behavior. The advantage one side would have over the other to directly communicate with the jury directly without big brother watching is too far. A little common sense about who could read it, the media, the judge, the other party in the case, other lawyers, other victims, are really the ones getting hurt from too much access and the inability to know when to put down the smartphone.

0 thoughts on “Does Tweeting in Court Jeopardize a Fair Trail?

  1. Shelly says:

    Hello,
    I agree with Michele’s post. I believe that cell phones and other electronic devices should be turned off in the courtroom. With the exception of allowing the court staff members, lawyers and media bring in electronic devices for business/ trail purposes. Under court policies, (are there policies in place??) juror members should be instructed beforehand that electronic devices are not allowed.

    For others, I think a clear written sign outside the courtroom saying “no electronic devices, if caught you will be escorted out by the baliff”. On top of that, be fined and/or banned from attending that particular trail. No expections!! . The legal system needs to nip this in the bud now with policies that work across the legal system. Or just say “no” to the use of electronic devices in the courtroom.

    There are enough variables for mistrail’s in the legal system already.

  2. bakercreative says:

    Hello,
    I agree with Michele’s post. I believe that cell phones and other electronic devices should be turned off in the courtroom. With the exception of allowing the court staff members, lawyers and media bring in electronic devices for business/ trail purposes. Under court policies, (are there policies in place??) juror members should be instructed beforehand that electronic devices are not allowed.

    For others, I think a clear written sign outside the courtroom saying “no electronic devices, if caught you will be escorted out by the baliff”. On top of that, be fined and/or banned from attending that particular trail. No expections!! . The legal system needs to nip this in the bud now with policies that work across the legal system. Or just say “no” to the use of electronic devices in the courtroom.

    There are enough variables for mistrail’s in the legal system already.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hurry, don't miss out, sign up today!